As if puppy mills weren’t evil enough here in the States – they’re now being outsourced. Apparently, some people still care more about papers than the well-being of an animal:
Puppy mills began proliferating overseas about five years ago, at about the same time that U.S. authorities started cracking down on unscrupulous domestic breeders.
Tom Sharp of the American Kennel Club says that’s when he started seeing bulldogs arriving from Russia and Yorkies from South Korea. With the help of the Internet, Sharp says, dishonest pet stores and breeders could easily get puppies overseas.
“That way, they don’t have to be inspected by the different organizations and the governments here in the U.S., and avoid all the requirements,” he says.
Right now, the only federal requirement an importer has to follow is to provide proof of a current rabies vaccine — documentation that is easily forged.
This is the specific incident that caught my ear on NPR yesterday:
In Los Angeles, one recent shipment of dead and ailing puppies from South Korea got the city’s attention. Twenty of the dogs in the shipment seized at Los Angeles International Airport either had died or had to be euthanized after the trip. The 10 survivors were turned over to the city’s shelter.
Five months later, those survivors — five miniature Maltese and five tiny Yorkshire terriers — were ready for adoption. Hundreds of animal lovers, many wrapped in blankets to keep warm, lined up on a chilly morning in front of L.A.’s East Valley Animal Shelter for a chance to bid on the dogs.
A couple of things trouble me. First, I’m a little conflicted about this auction. (Apparently, city law requires the shelter to hold an auction whenever more than one person wants to adopt a particular animal.) On the one hand, the shelter raised $20,000, and all ten of these purebreds (as well as 52 other pets from the shelter) were adopted. But the article made no mention of whether these purebreds were spayed and neutered. I would assume that coming from the shelter, they would be, but I have a hard time imagining that people would be lining up to shell out $1000 or more for a fixed purebred (one Yorkie reportedly went for $1100).
Secondly, I never have (and likely never will) understand why people are so hellbent on getting that dog with the papers and the bloodline. Is it a status symbol? Is it so they can breed the dog themselves and make a buck or two? I can understand loving a specific breed (I adore mastiffs and pit bulls) but what’s wrong with adopting from a breed-specific rescue group? There are lots of them out there. So, either people aren’t aware of these groups, or it really is just about the papers.
This is where I tend to get very judgmental and very PETA-ish. I often end up disagreeing with PETA’s tactics, if not their positions, but strict regulation of animal breeders is one area of agreement between us. And Oklahoma needs to step it up.
While most other states have cracked down on puppy mills, Oklahoma (as usual) lags behind the curve. We rank second in the country in terms of the number of “under the radar” puppy breeders. And for those who may not get as upset as I about the animal cruelty aspect, there are other reasons why you should care about this issue. Buyers aren’t ensured a good “product” (if you want to view a puppy as a product). The horrible conditions present in some of these breeding facilities can lead to diseases and temperament problems. I’ve heard people say that they buy from breeders because unlike adopting from a shelter, they “know what they’re getting.”
Well, that ain’t always so.
State Representative/veterinarian Lee Denney (R-Cushing) is proposing much-needed legislation. Her bill would establish:
…minimum standards for breeders, including proper housing, ensuring the animals nutritional needs are met and the animals receive veterinary care. The bill would also establish standards for breeders who sell 25 or more puppies a year.
I don’t have a lot of sympathy for those who complain about such regulation. I think it should be downright difficult for people to breed animals, and I would be more than happy to pay higher taxes myself to ensure the proper enforcement of such legislation.
Unfortunately, I suspect I’m once again in the minority on this one.