Mainstream (or whatever it is)
Commenting on one of Michelle’s posts, I offered up my take on what it means to be Mainstream:
My notion of The Mainstream is linked to the Lowest Common Denominator–that which is dumbed down in order to gain a larger audience. Music, film, television, news, and politics have all fallen victim. The Mainstream are the zombie-like masses looking to glossy advertisements and loud voices for what they should do next. Commercial radio tells them what music to like. Movie studios tell them what movies to like. Laugh tracks tell them what is funny. Charismatic radio talk show hosts tell them that gay marriage is more dangerous than poverty. FOX News tell them to be afraid…very afraid. Mortal people tell them things only divine tongues should whisper.
I don’t claim to be completely free of these influences. It’s impossible to not be a consumer. Still, I only have so much time & money. I don’t want to waste them on empty calories.
I came to the table with a preconceived negative opinion of what it is to be Mainstream. To me, Mainstream was something to avoid. As such, my definition centered around the non-thinking masses. The people who don’t think, who just follow the mob around them, particularly those who should know better. That is the Mainstream I’m trying to avoid.
Perhaps a more accurate definition of Mainstream would be that which is popular, or at least more visible. I believe this is the definition that Michelle was operating under when she offered that she was mainstream on some things, and not on others.
The definition offered up by Sarah in her Intellectual Detox experiment probably lies somewhere in between.
My definition wasn’t meant to be applied against other definitions. My definition was not saying that everything popular is dumb. And, it was certainly not personal. I’m glad that Michelle, and all of her friends, critically absorb what they see and read. It is my belief, however, that a good portion of Americans (and the world) do not. How else can you account for 70% of Americans believing that Saddam Hussein was personally involved in 9/11? Many of those Americans should know better. East coast, west coast, or Oklahoma–shouldn’t we know better?
It’s also interesting that my opinions of poverty being a more serious concern than gay marriage, and FOX News spreading fear, were seen as an attack on all conservative thought. It’s especially interesting considering FOX News viewers were more likely to have misperceptions on the war in Iraq than viewers of other networks. Nowhere did I say that ALL Fox News viewers, or conservatives, are dumb. I’m simply stating an opinion, and citing a study, both of which are open to rebuttal.
I listen to NPR on the way to work. I love sushi. I lean liberal. The bands I like tend not to get played on commercial radio. The movies I like often get relegated to the dark recesses of megaplexes, or don’t come around at all. It’s who I am. I offer no apologies for it.
So, then, why do I care what other people do?
I care because I believe that an informed electorate leads to better governance. And, better governance leads to better protections of “Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.” I care because art that is compromised in order to please the largest possible audience ceases to have meaning. When art ceases to have meaning, it no longer inspires. I care because it angers me to see people sell their souls for the sake of stockholders.
Choosing Applebees over a sushi bar, or Celine Dion over an obscure indie band, is not going to lead to the end of civilization. But, I think we owe it to ourselves as individuals to challenge our set ways. I also think, as a society, we should strive to higher qualities of both information and art. Personally, I have a lot of work to do. I hope that I can continue to learn and continue to challenge myself.




